Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The device was returned and the lot number was not confirmed as the packaging was not returned with the device.During visual inspection, the main coil and its delivery wire was seen kinked/bent.The proximal end of the coil delivery wire was seen to be broken/fractured.The coil introducer sheath was noted to be not returned.Functional testing was not performed as the visual analysis results proved sufficient.The reported event of coil proximal contact detached/separated could not be confirmed.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.During analysis, the main coil and the coil delivery wire was found to be kinked/bent.The proximal end of the coil delivery wire was seen broken/fractured.The coil introducer sheath was not returned.As assignable cause of not confirmed will be assigned to the as reported event of coil proximal contact detached/separated as the defect was not confirmed during the analysis.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the as analyzed event of coil delivery wire broken/fractured during use as it appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.An assignable cause of handling damage will be assigned to the as analyzed events of coil delivery wire kinked/bent and main coil kinked/bent as the defect appears to be associated with handling of the product or portion of the product during the procedure.
|