• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 10/24/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.This is one of three manufacturer reports being submitted for this case.Please reference related manufacturer report no: 2015691-2022-09425 and 2015691-2022-09426.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification from our affiliate in germany.As reported, this was a case of an implant of 26mm edwards sapien 3 ultra transcatheter heart valve, in the aortic position by transfemoral approach.During the procedure, when it was advancing the delivery system through the esheath, it was extremely difficult and required a lot of force.It seemed that the sheath was torn open and the sapien 3 ultra valve was pushed through the esheath distal tip and perforated part of the vessel.There was no lateral exit of the delivery system through the esheath.For commander delivery system with the crimped valve and esheath removal, it was needed to perform a surgical cutdown.Upon inspection of the retrieved devices, no damaged was found on the device.The patient was operated on no valve was implanted.As per the pre-decontamination evaluation, the valve was found to have one bent strut.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for evaluation and an engineering evaluation was performed.The returned device was visually inspected for any abnormalities and the following was observed: the crimped thv valve was over the delivery system inflation balloon area.One (1) strut bent outward at valve outflow side.The thv valve was expanded and the valve frame was distorted/canted.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure.The complaint of valve frame damage was confirmed based on returned device.A review of the dhr, lot history, complaint history, and manufacturing mitigation did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the complaint event.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, ''during procedure, when it was pushing the catheter through the esheath, it was extremely difficult and required a lot of force.It seems that the sheath was torn open (liner punctured) and the sapien 3 ultra valve was pushed through the esheath and, then perforated part of the vessel.For commander delivery system with the crimped valve and esheath removal, it was needed to perform a cutdown''.Additionally, the patient's access vessel had presence of calcification and tortuosity.The presence of calcification and tortuosity can create challenging pathway during delivery system withdrawal, leading to resistance.Device evaluation revealed bent struts at outflow and the crimped valve appeared moved to the inflation balloon, which may suggest excessive device manipulation during system withdrawal.Excessive force applied to manipulate the device can lead to the valve struts interacting with the sheath shaft and resulted in strut damage at the outflow during retrieval.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (calcification, tortuosity) and/or procedural factors (excessive device manipulation, withdrawal of crimped valve) may have contributed to the complaint event.No device or labeling problem was identified during the evaluation.Therefore, no further escalation (capa/scar/pra) is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16018980
MDR Text Key305872593
Report Number2015691-2022-10186
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/03/2024
Device Model Number9750TFX26
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/03/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-