|
Model Number UNK-NV-ECHELON |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 09/26/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Cabral de andrade g, lesczynsky a, clímaco vm, et al.Cerebral venous sinuses thrombosis in both transverse sinus and torcula: multistep endovascular treatment and stenting.Interventional neuroradiology.2017;23(1):84-89.Doi:10.1177/1591019916674917 b.3.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article [or the date that the article was accepted for publication] as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Cabral de andrade g, lesczynsky a, clímaco vm, et al.Cerebral venous sinuses thrombosis in both transverse sinus and torcula: multistep endovascular treatment and stenting.Interventional neuroradiology.2017;23(1):84-89.Doi:10.1177/1591019916674917 medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with an echelon 14 microcatheter.The purpose of this article was to present the possibility of endovascular treatment in multiple steps with mechanical thrombolysis with balloon, local pharmacological thrombolysis and stenting, in a 67 year old female patient with a severe form of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (cvst).The article does not state any technical issues during use of the echelon microcatheter the following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted: in the first step we performed mechanical thrombolysis with balloon angioplasty; after microcatherization of the venous sinus, transfixing the whole clot with the microcatheter echelon 14 and microguide wire traxcess 14 and traxcess docking wire 14, the angioplasty balloon viatrac 6x20mm was positioned in a coaxial position and inflated, performing static mechanical thrombolysis all over the extension of both lateral sinus and torcula.The second step was also mechanical thrombolysis, but performed in dynamic way with the balloon partially inflated, pulling it from one extreme to another of the occluded lateral sinus multiple times in order to reach a further clot fragmentation.The third step was local pharmacological thrombolysis with alteplase infused through the microcatheter at a total dose of 0.9 mg/kg and a final dose of 65 mg.Angiographic controls were performed for 30 min without sinus recanalization.Following this a fourth and final step was performed, which was angioplasty with multiple carotid stents, with a total of six (06) from the right sigmoid sinus to the left transverse sinus, using the carotid stent xact 7x30mm with final angiographic control showing a complete recanalization all over the venous dural system.It was noted that every effort was made to obtain recanalization with the first 3 steps; despite the failure of these procedures, they opted for multiple carotid stents (fourth step).A stent was initially placed at the distal end of the thrombus and, after ensuring that recanalization had been obtained, additional stents were placed until recanalization was confirmed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received reported that there were no adverse events relate to medtronic devices.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|