Additional information: patient weight, ethnicity, and race: unknown as information was asked, but not provided.Date implanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Date explanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Device evaluated by mfr: the device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a visual analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and historical data analysis for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
Product investigation was completed, and the following fields were updated accordingly: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 18-jan-2023.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the suspect iol was received inside of the daisy wheel.The iol was cleaned and visual inspection under magnification was performed.Damages on the surface of the iol and a detached haptic were observed.No other issues were identified.Complaint issue "haptic damage" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|