As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced worsening pelvic pain, difficulty with voiding, recurrent urinary tract infections and urge incontinence.Patient had explantation and revision of the device, vaginal paravaginal repair with xenograft, posterior repair and perineorrhaphy, cystourethroscopy, and excision of labial cyst under general anesthesia.Intraoperative findings noted a grade 2-3 cystocele, bilateral paravaginal defects and weakened pelvic tissue.Patient was noted to have a stage ii rectocele after portions of the device were explanted.On exam, a 5 mm linear device exposure on the posterior apical wall was noted.
|
Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|