• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK_NAV_SYS
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Numbness (2415); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 09/05/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Gurel, r., amzallag, n., benady, a., efrima, b., barriga, j., gortzak, y., sternheim, a., dadia, s., hasbani, n., segal, o.Intraoperative three-dimensional navigation for surgical treatment of osteoid osteoma in the foot and ankle ¿ a series of 14 cases.Foot and ankle surgery.2022.28 (1468¿1472) https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Fas.2022.09.001 background: the surgical treatment for osteoid osteoma (oo) in the foot and ankle is challenging.It is difficult to locate the lesion and the anatomy is crowded by sensitive structures.The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of navigated mini open-intralesional curettage (nmic) or navigated minimally invasive radiofrequency ablation (nmrfa) in treating these lesions.Methods: all patients who underwent surgery for oo in the foot and ankle between 2015 and 2020 were included.O-arm navigation was used in all procedures.The choice of nmic versus nmrfa was made by the surgeon according to the location of the lesion and its proximity to sensitive anatomic structures.Results: fourteen patients were included.Ten were operated by nmrfa and 4 by nmic.All patients¿ symptoms related to oo resolved following a single procedure.Average aofas score increased by 18.7 (p <(><<)>.001).Three patients had the following complications: pathologic fracture, superficial infection and transient deep peroneal nerve sensory loss.Conclusion: navigated surgical treatment of oo in the foot and ankle is accurate, efficient and safe reported events: patient no.8: pathologic fracture 4 weeks after navigated mini-open excision and burr curettage of 1st digit proximal phalanx, treated by surgical kwire fixation and allogeneic bone graft.Patient #14 experienced a transient loss of sensation in the deep peroneal nerve distribution following navigated minimally invasive rfa of oo in the distal tibia.Patient #9, underwent a nonnavigated open procedure to treat his lesion (oo in the 1st toe), not by our team.The procedure failed because the tumor was missed.Three months later, he underwent a successful navigated open curettage by our team with no recurrence after 31.3 months of follow up.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient age is the mean value of patients in the study.Patient gender is the majority value of patient in the study.Patient weight not available from the site.Event date is the online accepted date of the literature article.Device lot number, or serial number, unavailable.510(k) is dependent upon the device model number and therefore, unavailable.No parts have been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.Device manufacturing date is dependent on lot number/serial number, therefore, unavailable.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.It was reported that adverse events were mainly from the ablation device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION
Type of Device
NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key16131475
MDR Text Key307011310
Report Number1723170-2023-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age22 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-