Reported event: an event regarding rebushing involving a patient specific, proximal tibial, bumper was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for patient specific proximal tibial replacement which was inserted on (b)(6) 2005.The surgeon requested a rebushing of the knee.The x-ray images provided showed that the femoral and tibial stems were in good alignment and fixation.There was no disengagement of the knee bearing components.However, the complete knee joint in front view of the x-ray was missing which may affect the review.Therefore, the radiographic review cannot confirm the clinical request but considering the implant was in situ over 17 years, normal wear and tear of the knee bearing components are expected.Thus, the clinical request for rebushing can be supported.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including progress notes, operative reports additional x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|