• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - SCREWS: FNS LOCKING; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - SCREWS: FNS LOCKING; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 01/03/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.This report is for an unknown screw: fns locking/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: yoon, j.Y., byun, s.E.And cho, y.H.(2022).Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients., research square, vol.X (xx) pages 1-10, (south korea).The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to discuss the initial experience of using a new fixation device (fns) and evaluate the radiological complications, such as nonunion, osteonecrosis, and screw cut-out.Furthermore, despite the small number of study participants, they identified several statistically significant factors related to surgical failure.Between july 2019 and june 2021, a total of 43 patients [ 25 females and 18 males with mean age of 62.1 (range: 57.7¿66.5) years] underwent osteosynthesis using fns (femoral neck system) during the study period were included in the analysis.The median clinical follow-up period was 11.8 months (range: 10.1¿13.4).The following complications were reported as follows: 4 patients complained of residual pain in the affected hip at the final follow-up, and 6 presented with limping gaits.All 4 patients later underwent arthroplasty due to serious complications during follow-up as mentioned below the following: - 48 years old, female patient who had femoral neck fracture (fnf) with underlying moderate-grade intellectual, underwent revision surgery due to nonunion.The patient was diagnosed with garden type 4 fnf (femoral neck fracture), and the bone quality was poor due to general medical conditions.- 59 years old, male, underwent revision surgery due to nonunion.- 55 years old, male, who underwent revision surgery due to bolt cutout.- 78 years old, male, who underwent revision surgery due to post-traumatic osteoarthritis for the reason of osteonecrosis.After the complete bone union was confirmed, 5 patients (mean age, 43.8 years; mean bmi, 23.1 kg/m2; female: male ratio = 2:3) underwent additional surgery for implant removal, and the mean duration between initial surgery and implant removal was 17.6 (range: 14.7¿18.9) months.During the implant removal procedure, distal locking screw stripping occurred in 3 patients.The implant could only be removed after forced metal plate cutting with a hercules plate cutter or saw due to screw breakage, but implants were successfully removed from all the patients.No acute perioperative complications were observed during admission, except in 2 cases that showed short-term postoperative delirium.However, the delirium subsided within 3 days, and both patients were successfully discharged from the hospital after rehabilitation.No postoperative infections were noted during the follow-up period.- another case of an implant removal failure of a 61-year-old female patient that due to a jammed locking screw, the plate had to be cut in half using a metal cutting saw (arrowheads) to get it removed from the patient and stripping of the internal hexagon in the head of a locking screw (arrow) occurred easily.The screw and the remaining plate were easily pulled out together, and no screw shank fracture occurred.This report is for an unk - screw: fns locking.This is report 1 of 8 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - SCREWS: FNS LOCKING
Type of Device
SCREW, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
3035526892
MDR Report Key16247359
MDR Text Key308179937
Report Number8030965-2023-00975
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-