• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600LDS29A
Device Problems Deflation Problem (1149); Inflation Problem (1310)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/11/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported by the edwards field clinical specialist, during a transfemoral case in aortic position, during inflation of a 29mm commander delivery system, there was resistance in inflating the balloon to deploy the valve.The 29mm sapien 3 valve was 1mm higher than the distal marker band.The valve began to inflate more distally and eventually dog boned and anchored within the calcium.Upon deflation, the balloon did not deflate.It took multiple attempts to deflate the balloon, requiring a longer pacing run.The balloon deflated and there was no injury to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned devices were visually inspected, and the following was observed: radial compression of flex shaft approximately 4 inches from flex tip.Kink on balloon shaft just proximal of warning marker, likely due to packaging.During pre-decontamination evaluation, the following functional testing was performed: able to successfully lock/unlock and perform full valve alignment (gross alignment and fine adjust) with no issues; able to successfully inflate/deflate with no issues.Locknut/collet force measurements met specification.Inflation/deflation time measurements met specification.Imagery was provided by the site and revealed the following: the inflation balloon was fully inflated and transcatheter heart valve was deployed.The patient's access vessels, aorta, and native annulus were calcified.The patient's access vessels were undersized.The complaints for inflation difficulty and partial/slow balloon deflation were unable to be confirmed as the complaint events could not be replicated on the returned device during evaluation.Visual, functional, or dimensional analysis did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint.A review of ifu/ training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, "the valve began to inflate more distally and eventually dog boned and anchored within the calcium.Upon deflation, the balloon did not deflate.It took multiple attempts to deflate the balloon, requiring a longer pacing run.The balloon deflated and there was no injury to the patient." as no abnormalities were observed during device preparation and neither the inflation nor deflation difficulty were able to be re-created during evaluation of the returned device, it is likely that calcification of the patient's native anatomy resulted in an inadvertent torquing of the device.Under these conditions, calcified anatomy can present difficult angles or constrained conditions resulting in higher resistance for the delivery system to overcome during tracking and subsequently affecting inflation and deflation.Per the training manual, "to prevent kinking of the delivery system, do not torque the handle while rotating the flex wheel" and "ensure the edwards logo is facing up on the delivery system." it is possible that the system was excessively manipulated/torqued during tracking, compromising the integrity of the components involved in the fluid path and contributing to the reported slow inflation and deflation of the balloon.However, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined.Available information suggests patient factors (calcification) and/or procedural factors (torquing the device) contributed to the inflation difficulty, and partial/slow balloon deflation.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16281069
MDR Text Key308918801
Report Number2015691-2023-10487
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103193961
UDI-Public(01)00690103193961(17)240807(10)64526657
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/01/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9600LDS29A
Device Catalogue Number9600LDS29A
Device Lot Number64526657
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-