EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 9750TFX23 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 01/12/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification from our affiliate in germany.As reported, this was a case of an implant of a 23mm sapien 3 ultra in the aortic position by transfemoral approach.During the procedure, the esheath was inserted via right femoral artery.A temporary pacemaker lead via left femoral vein was positioned into rv apex.Testing capture <2v.The valve was in position for implant with position marker on base of cusps.Rapid pacing with 180 beats/min was initiated.While deploying the valve, and the valve was half opened, there was a loss of capture of the pacemaker.The next pacemaker non capture embolized the valve towards the ascending aorta.The embolized valve was retrieved towards the descending thoracic aorta and was implanted.The pacemaker lead was positioned new with additional capture testing and rapid pacing test.In the meantime, a new 23mm sapien 3 ultra kit valve was prepared, and the valve was implanted without problems.Patient condition is good.The root cause of the valve embolization was due to loss of pacing capture.The root cause of the valve embolization was the ppm capture loss.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.Device remained implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for evaluation as it remained implanted.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint of valve embolized into aorta was unable to be confirmed as no imagery/medical record was provided for evaluation.There was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Therefore, no device history record or lot history are required.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, ''while deploying the valve, and the valve was half opened there was a loss of capture of the pacemaker.The next pacemaker non capture embolized the valve towards ascending aorta.Embolized valve was retrieved towards descending thoracal aorta.The root cause of the valve embolization was the ppm capture loss''.Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve embolization is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.In this case it was reported ''there was a loss of capture of the pacemaker''.Per training manual, ''loss of capture during rapid pacing can cause sudden delivery system movement during deployment'', which could cause the delivery system (with valve) to move toward aorta resulting in embolization.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|