• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWER PORT MRI ISP, 8 FR. GROSHONG, INT W SP, ATTACHABLE SL; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWER PORT MRI ISP, 8 FR. GROSHONG, INT W SP, ATTACHABLE SL; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8808560
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Extravasation (1842); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 08/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three weeks post port placement procedure, patient allegedly experienced swelling around the port site.It was further reported that catheter was allegedly fractured upon x-ray examination and the fractured segment had allegedly reached the right ventricle.Reportedly, the fractured segment was retrieved by using snare and the port was removed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three weeks post port placement procedure, patient allegedly experienced swelling around the port site.It was further reported that catheter was allegedly fractured upon x-ray examination and the fractured segment had allegedly reached the right ventricle.Reportedly, the fractured segment was retrieved by using snare and the port was removed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, an image and photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 09/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three weeks post port placement procedure, patient allegedly experienced swelling around the port site.It was further reported that catheter was allegedly fractured upon x-ray examination and the fractured segment had allegedly reached the right ventricle.It was also reported that extravasation of normal saline was identified and reported pain from the patient.Reportedly, the fractured segment was retrieved by using snare and the port was removed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately three weeks post port placement procedure, patient allegedly experienced swelling around the port site.It was further reported that catheter was allegedly fractured upon x-ray examination and the fractured segment had allegedly reached the right ventricle.It was also reported that extravasation of normal saline was identified and reported pain from the patient.Reportedly, the fractured segment was retrieved by using snare and the port was removed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one powerport mri isp implantable port attached to a groshong catheter in two segments were returned for evaluation.Functional, gross visual, tactile and microscopic visual evaluations were performed.In addition to the returned physical sample, four electronic photos and one electronic image were provided for review.Image review shows a focal disruption of catheter integrity just proximal to the arc of the catheter and it represents an early complication of catheter fracture with subsequent embolization of distal catheter segment.A complete diagonal break was noted on the distal end of the attached catheter and the edges of the complete diagonal break were noted to be uneven.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture, material separation and migration issues.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fluid leak issue as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event was unknown.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiry date: 09/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWER PORT MRI ISP, 8 FR. GROSHONG, INT W SP, ATTACHABLE SL
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key16324238
MDR Text Key309048079
Report Number3006260740-2023-00376
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741098994
UDI-Public(01)00801741098994
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8808560
Device Lot NumberREFX2035
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Manufacturer Received04/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight50 KG
-
-