• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number ENVPRO-16
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the handle appeared intact.The device was received with the capsule partially opened.There was a severe buckle observed in the capsule nitinol reinforcing frame near the proximal end of the capsule.The device was returned with the end cap/screw gear snap fit connected.A stylet could be inserted into the nosecone and after engaging the handle button, the handle jumped proximally and the capsule separated at the site of the original buckle.The separation site was observed to be jagged and uneven.The trigger moved to fully advanced and retracted positions and locked in place when released following the capsule separation.The deployment knob could not retract or advance the full capsule due to the capsule separation.The tip-retrieval mechanism appeared intact but could not retract the nosecone due to the capsule separation.Conclusion: the investigation has not been completed at this time.Select patient information cannot be included in regulatory report due to regional privacy regulations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during attempted deployment of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the valve dislodged multiple times due to the pressure loss during pacing.The valve was withdrawn and replaced with a non-medtronic valve.The pacing was increased up to 180 beats per minute (bpm).Of note, a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with a non-medtronic (true) balloon.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the subject delivery catheter system (dcs) was returned to medtronic for analysis.Procedural images were not provided for review.The device was received with the capsule partially opened.Delamination was observed over the nitinol reinforcing frame along the mid-section to the proximal end of the capsule.Delamination was observed on the capsule, which typically occurs when the capsule is subjected to a bending force.There was a severe buckle observed in the capsule nitinol reinforcing frame near the proximal end of the capsule.A stylet could be inserted into the nosecone and after engaging the handle button, the handle jumped proximally, and the capsule separated at the site of the original buckle.Capsule separation occurs due to excessive compressive forces applied to the capsule.Forces in the system is a cumulative effect that may be increased by factors such as tortuous anatomy and load quality.It seems most likely that damage to the capsule occurred during the recapturing of the valve following the reported multiple dislodgements.It is also possible that the damage to the capsule occurred during preparation of the device to return to the facility for analysis.The reported event indicates that the valve dislodged multiple times.Potential factors that can influence dislodgement include tension applied on the dcs during positioning, calcification levels and shape of the native anatomy.In this case it was stated that the dislodgement occurred due to the pressure loss during pacing.Dislodgement events do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.A device history record (dhr) review was performed on the dcs and there were no correlations/issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.The dhr review did not show any findings related to this event.Updated h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: section e: postal code medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16368238
MDR Text Key309498885
Report Number2025587-2023-00510
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/18/2024
Device Model NumberENVPRO-16
Device Catalogue NumberENVPRO-16
Device Lot Number0011026550
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/04/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/18/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight108 KG
-
-