|
Model Number FGS-0635 |
Device Problem
Positioning Failure (1158)
|
Patient Problems
Hypoxia (1918); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Unintended Radiation Exposure (4565)
|
Event Date 01/26/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the reporter, after deploying the capsule, the physician went back in with the scope and the capsule was not attached to the esophagus.The physician searched the patient¿s esophagus, stomach, and duodenum with the scope and finger swept the mouth.X-ray was ordered with fear that perhaps the capsule was in the bronchi, went back in with the scope and was able to locate the capsule in the stomach.The physician used placement of the capsule in the standard method of 6cm above the les.The catheter was advanced down the esophagus, and verification of catheter placement was obtained with the endoscope prior to deploying the capsule.Suction was turned on and maintained for a full 60 seconds, prior to deploying the device.The capsule was deployed, vacuum was turned off, and then the deployment device was removed.The endoscope was used to verify the capsule was in place, however, the capsule could not be visualized.The endoscope was advanced into the stomach and duodenum looking for the capsule and finger sweep, but the capsule could not be located.The patient¿s o2 saturation dropped and anesthesiology used a laryngeal scope to look for the capsule in the airway.An x-ray was obtained to look for the capsule -the bravo capsule appeared obliquely positioned in a way that would not normally be in the esophagus.Bronchoscopy was done by a thoracic surgeon but no capsule was found.2nd x-ray was obtained and the capsule was noted below diaphragm.The endoscope was used again to locate the capsule, where it was found in the stomach and removed.The procedure was repeated and a new capsule was placed successfully.The patient went home after the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|