• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEATH VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEATH VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600TFX26A
Device Problem Calcified (1077)
Patient Problem Dyspnea (1816)
Event Date 01/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Edwards received notification from a field clinical specialist that a patient with a 9600tfx 26mm sapien 3 valve, implanted in the aortic position for approximately 4 years and 6 months is failing due to severe stenosis with mild leaflet calcification.As reported, the patient presented with shortness of breath and increased o2 demands.The patient was not a surgical candidate for open avr.The patient was worked-up for a possible balloon aortic valvuloplasty with transcatheter valve-in-valve as a back-up.However, the procedure has not been scheduled at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is in progress, a supplemental report will be submitted.Device remained implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation as it remained implanted.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint of valve calcification was confirmed from the medical record.Review of dhr did not indicate any manufacturing non-conformances contributed to the reported event.A review of the ifu revealed no deficiencies.An existing edwards' technical summary documents the root cause analysis on valve calcification over the time in patient.Per the technical summary, calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Edwards' thv valves undergo a process used to reduce calcification variability and lower calcification levels.Clinical results of thv implantation show similar mortality and significantly lower svd rate compared with surgical aortic valve replacement after 6 years of functioning.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent calcification from occurring in bioprosthetic valves.Furthermore, evaluation of reported complaints for valve calcification did not confirm any manufacturing non-conformances and identified that the proper manufacturing mitigations have been implemented.Additionally, per the technical summary, no evidence of a product non-conformance or device malfunction were found in any of the valves returned for these complaints.Review of medical record revealed that the patient has a medical history of hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus, which are well-known risk factors for leaflet calcification.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (hyperlipidemia and diabetes) may have contributed to the reported event.No device or labeling problem was identified during the evaluation.Therefore, no further escalation (capa/scar/pra) is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Supplemental report submitted to include additional information received.The patient underwent a bav procedure with a good result approximately 4 years and 8 months post initial valve implant.A 24mm true balloon was used with gradient reduction from 53mmhg pre to 16mmhg post via echo.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEATH VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16379184
MDR Text Key309578901
Report Number2015691-2023-10814
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194357
UDI-Public(01)00690103194357(17)200402
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/15/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/02/2020
Device Model Number9600TFX26A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/18/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-