Edwards received notification from a field clinical specialist that a patient with a 9600tfx 26mm sapien 3 valve, implanted in the aortic position for approximately 4 years and 6 months is failing due to severe stenosis with mild leaflet calcification.As reported, the patient presented with shortness of breath and increased o2 demands.The patient was not a surgical candidate for open avr.The patient was worked-up for a possible balloon aortic valvuloplasty with transcatheter valve-in-valve as a back-up.However, the procedure has not been scheduled at this time.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation as it remained implanted.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint of valve calcification was confirmed from the medical record.Review of dhr did not indicate any manufacturing non-conformances contributed to the reported event.A review of the ifu revealed no deficiencies.An existing edwards' technical summary documents the root cause analysis on valve calcification over the time in patient.Per the technical summary, calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Edwards' thv valves undergo a process used to reduce calcification variability and lower calcification levels.Clinical results of thv implantation show similar mortality and significantly lower svd rate compared with surgical aortic valve replacement after 6 years of functioning.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent calcification from occurring in bioprosthetic valves.Furthermore, evaluation of reported complaints for valve calcification did not confirm any manufacturing non-conformances and identified that the proper manufacturing mitigations have been implemented.Additionally, per the technical summary, no evidence of a product non-conformance or device malfunction were found in any of the valves returned for these complaints.Review of medical record revealed that the patient has a medical history of hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus, which are well-known risk factors for leaflet calcification.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (hyperlipidemia and diabetes) may have contributed to the reported event.No device or labeling problem was identified during the evaluation.Therefore, no further escalation (capa/scar/pra) is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|