Edwards received notification from the implant patient registry, that a patient with a 9750tfx 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve, implanted in the aortic position for 2 years and 5 months, underwent an explant procedure due to unknown reasons.No additional details were provided.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint of valve explant was unable to be confirmed due to unavailability of returned device/relevant imagery/medical records.A review of the dhr did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the complaint event.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Per the instructions for use (ifu), device explant is listed as one of the potential risks associated with the device and tavr procedure.In this case, the valve is not available for evaluation.The reason for explanting the valve approximately 2 years and 5 months post-tavr is unknown.Due to limited information, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined at this time.No device or labeling problem was identified during the evaluation.Therefore, no further escalation (capa/scar/pra) is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|