C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP MRI 6F CHRONW/OS; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 8806061 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 09/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, images were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 02/2023).
|
|
Event Description
|
It has been reported that three months and nineteen days post port placement, the catheter tip allegedly dislocated from vena cava to vena jugularis.It was further reported that the port was removed.The procedure was completed using another device.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It has been reported that three months and nineteen days post port placement, the catheter tip allegedly dislocated from vena cava to vena jugularis.It was further reported that the port was removed.The procedure was completed using another device.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.However, four images were provided for review.The images shows recurrent migration of the catheter from the subclavian vein to the internal jugular vein.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported migration issue as the catheter migrates.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.However, four images were provided for review.The images shows recurrent migration of the catheter from the subclavian vein to the internal jugular vein.As per the image review, the length of intravascular catheter was insufficient as the catheter tip does not appear to have been initially positioned below the level of the carina.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported migration issue as the catheter migrates.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.The instructions for use states: cut down procedure: 6.Advance the catheter into the vessel to the desired infusion site.Note: catheters should be positioned with the catheter tip at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium.Verify correct catheter tip position, using fluoroscopy or appropriate technology.H10: d4 (expiration date: 02/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It has been reported that three months and nineteen days post port placement, the catheter tip was allegedly dislocated from the vena cava to vena jugularis.It was further reported that the port was removed.The procedure was completed using another device.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|