Model Number D332 |
Device Problems
Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Interrogation Problem (4017)
|
Patient Problems
Shock (2072); Electric Shock (2554)
|
Event Date 03/02/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient went into the physician office after receiving 2 shocks.The physician reported being unable to interrogate the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) device.The patient was admitted to the hospital.A revision procedure was completed.Interrogation of device post explant revealed device was in safety mode with a premature battery depletion.A boston scientific representative stated the physician was not able to determine if the shocks the patient received prior to explant were appropriate or not.A new device was implanted.Besides surgical intervention no adverse patient effects were reported.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
At this time the device has not been returned.Therefore a technical analysis cannot be conducted.Without a returned device it is not possible to definitively confirm how the device may have contributed to the complaint incident.If the device is returned, product analysis will be completed, and an updated supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient went into the physician office after receiving 2 shocks.The physician reported being unable to interrogate the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) device.The patient was admitted to the hospital.A revision procedure was completed.Interrogation of device post explant revealed device was in safety mode with a premature battery depletion.A boston scientific representative stated the physician was not able to determine if the shocks the patient received prior to explant were appropriate or not.A new device was implanted.Besides surgical intervention no adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A thorough evaluation of the device was performed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual inspection of the device noted scratches and tool marks on the case and header.With a small dent on the case in the back.The case was swollen in the area of the hv capacitors.Review of device memory indicated that a charge timeout alert (> 45 seconds) had been recorded.The device case was opened, and visual inspection noted that one of the two high voltage (hv) capacitors was slightly swollen.The hv capacitor was analyzed, and it was concluded that the hv capacitor experienced internal arcing caused by a low resistance pathway between anode and cathode plates within the capacitor.This capacitor issue impacted the ability of the device to provide shock therapy because the hv capacitors could not be fully charged, but brady pacing, telemetry, and other device functionality remained available.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|