• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number LTF-VH
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Mechanical Problem (1384); Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was received and evaluated.Device evaluation found deformation of the video connector, due to deformation, watertigtness is lost.Air leak inspection failed.The reported issue of "air/water leakages" was confirmed.Furthermore, as stated in section b5, device evaluation found the adhesive of the objective lens were peeled off.This condition attributed due to deterioration, physical stress.Additionally, the following defects were identified during device inspection: a-rubber (insertion section) has a scratch.Adhesive on a-rubber (adhesive connection) has a chip.Video connector case has a crack.Switch 1 (sw1) has a cut.Due to wear of angle wire, bending angle in up direction does not meet the standard value.Investigation is ongoing.This report will be supplemented accordingly following investigation.
 
Event Description
Company representative sent a repair request reported with an issue of " air/water leakages".No harm was reported.No patient harm, no user injury reported.Device evaluation, the adhesives around the objective lens were peeled off.This report is being submitted due to the finding of adhesives around the objective lens were peeled off (deterioration, physical stress) identified during device return evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, the root cause of the event was unable to be identified; however, the event likely occurred due to use stress, external factors, or handling.The inspection method for this event is described as follows in the instructions for use "chapter 3 preparations and inspections 3.2 preparations and inspections of the endoscope"."[external inspection of the endoscope body] 1.Confirm that there are no scratches, chips, dirt, gaps around the lens, etc.On the objective lens and illumination lens at the tip." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16782740
MDR Text Key313737751
Report Number9610595-2023-06463
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170287015
UDI-Public04953170287015
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K080948
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLTF-VH
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/28/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-