• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 09/05/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 were received which indicate that while the patient was under the care of his previous physician, the lead wire of the vns broke and the device stopped functioning because of this.Per the notes, "it has never been determined to put it back".Notes dated (b)(6) 2012, indicate the patient has one to two seizures which are small every seven days.The physician states that he will discuss if there is benefit in starting the vns treatment.The patient's vns device had been previously explanted with no replacement, and therefore the clinic notes were sent because the patient was considering getting implanted with vns again.Product analysis of the explanted generator and lead indicated that the generator depletion was an expected event as determined by a battery life calculation and the battery voltage measurement.There was no condition noted during the product analysis evaluation that would suggest any anomaly with the generator.A significant portion of the lead was not returned; only about 11 cm of lead was returned.Since a portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary could not be made on that portion of the lead.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.The lead explant had been prophylactic per the surgeon.The operative notes were received, dated (b)(6) 2012, which indicate that upon inspection of the lead, the lead sheath appeared to be intact.However, there was fluid density within the lead consistent with a break in the sheath at some point.Given this potential lead break, the surgeon did not replace the generator and severed the lead at the generator, leaving the remaining lead in the body.Per programming history, system diagnostics were within normal limits in (b)(6) 2011 and the returned portion of the device had no anomalies per product analysis.No other information has been provided.
 
Event Description
Notes from (b)(6) 2015 reported that after the battery depleted and the leads fractures, the patient did not want vns replaced at that time.Reimplant has not occurred to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Only a portion of the device was returned for analysis, which found no anomalies.Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3563168
MDR Text Key4059872
Report Number1644487-2014-00134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/08/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/14/2010
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200421
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/18/2012
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received04/21/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/28/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age20 YR
-
-