Notes dated (b)(6) 2013 indicated that the patient may have had a seizure on (b)(6) 2013.The device was interrogated at 1.75/20/130/30/5/1.75/30.The impedance was ok (dcdc=3), the output status was ok, and the battery was noted to be functioning well.Notes dated (b)(6) 2013 indicated that the patient presented with a 2 year history of voice changes and hoarseness.The patient did not experienced any hoarseness following vns implant, except when it fires.A flexible videostroboscopy was performed with mild atrophy and supraglottic contraction but otherwise normal results.The event was determined to be muscle tension dysphonia for which the patient was referred for speech therapy.Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 stated that the patient felt that her device was no longer working.The patient had three grandma seizures during the year.Prior to that, the patient had not had any seizures in 12 years.The patient also noted that her voice felt weak at times and thought the events might be related.A flexible laryngoscopy was performed: bot, vallecula, and piriform sinuses were clear and normal.Both true vocal cords showed good mobility, but there was possible slight bowing with a 1 mm gap.Moderate arytenoid erythema and mild edema were present.It was reported that the patient has possible mild age related atrophy and mild laryngitis contributing to her voice changes.The patient was referred for generator revision.The vns generator replacement was performed on (b)(6) 2014.The explanted vns device was discarded and therefore cannot be returned.Attempts are being made for additional information; however, no other information has been provided.
|