(b)(4).Method: the four complaint rt265 infant dual-heated evaqua2 breathing circuits were not returned to fisher & paykel healthcare in (b)(4) for evaluation.Despite requests for the complaint devices to be returned the hospital disposed of the circuits.However the hospital was able to return a number of unopened rt265 breathing circuits for investigation.Eleven breathing circuits were pressure tested and visually inspected for damage.Our investigation is based on the event description, investigation of the returned unopened devices and our knowledge of the product.Results: no damage was found to any part of the returned unopened rt265 breathing circuits.The pressure test revealed that all of the eleven tested circuits were within specification.Conclusion: without the return of the complaint devices we are unable to determine what may have caused the problems experienced by the customer.In addition, we could find no fault with the unopened circuits returned by the hospital.If the breathing circuit connections are not tight a leak may develop.All rt265 breathing circuits are pressure tested before leaving the production line and those that fail are discarded.It is therefore most likely that the damage occurred after leaving our production facility.The user instructions that accompany the rt265 infant dual heated evaqua2 breathing circuit state the following: "check all connections are tight before use." "perform a pressure and leak test on the breathing system and check for occlusion before connecting to a patient." "set appropriate ventilator alarms.".
|