• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problems Shock (2072); Tingling (2171)
Event Date 01/01/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.It was reported that the patient had experienced a shocking sensation and the device was checked.The device was not programmed off after observing the high impedance.Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2014 noted that the patient has experienced a shocking sensation on the left side of the neck for about the past 6 months.The notes indicate that the patient has parasthesias in the left neck radiating up to the left ear.The neurologist reported that the device was not at end of service and it was unknown if any patient manipulation or trauma occurred that could have contributed to the high impedance.The patient was referred to neurosurgeon.No known surgical intervention has been performed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to high impedance.A pre-operative system diagnostic test showed high impedance (dc dc - 7).The replacement generator was first tested with the existing lead and system diagnostic results still showed high impedance (dc dc - 7).The surgeon then replaced the patient's lead and system diagnostic results showed lead impedance within normal limits.It was noted that the surgeon was unable to explant the electrodes of the lead due to scar tissue around the jugular vein.The patient's replacement device was not programmed on during the procedure.The explanted devices have not been returned to date.The patient stated that she began experiencing pain in her ear approximately six months prior to the initial report of the event.The pain had since moved to the chest and neck incisions sites.The patient was able to differentiate stimulation on-times and off-times and clarified that the pain was intermittent and did not only occur with stimulation on-times.No patient trauma was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3971704
MDR Text Key4753290
Report Number1644487-2014-01911
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/03/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/31/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2009
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200104
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received08/06/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/07/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age46 YR
-
-