Model Number 105 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
Event Date 05/30/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vns patient underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2014 to explant the patient¿s generator due to infection.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis of the returned generator was completed.There were no adverse functional, mechanical, or visual issues identified with the returned generator.Results of diagnostic testing indicated the device was operating properly.Electrical test showed that the pulse generator was operating within specification.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed sterilization for the generator prior to distribution.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had recently undergone generator replacement prior to the infection.It was reported that the patient presented with erythematous swelling to the wound and debridement occurred with explant.The generator was cultured and noted to have staphylococcus aureus.The patient is being treated with oral antibiotics.The explanted generator was received for analysis.The returned product form indicated that the generator was not replaced during explant surgery.Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Age at time of event, date of birth; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently did not provide age for the patient.Date of event; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently provided an incorrect event date.Device available for evaluation?; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently did not provide the information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that vns patient underwent generator replacement on (b)(6) 2015.The lead impedance of the implanted vns system was 1993 ohms.It was reported that the decision made for replacement is due to patient having increase in seizures without the vns therapy.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|