• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problem Battery Problem: High Impedance (2947)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/06/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device was tested and system diagnostic results revealed high impedance (dc dc ¿ 6).The patient was sent for x-rays.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the lead was completed on 12/15/2014.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil exposed portion show that the coil was exposed to some type-of electro-cautery tool.Scanning electron microscopy images of the negative coil ends at the first and second portion of the lead show that the coil was exposed to and cut using some type of electro-cautery tool as indicated by the fused wires.Review of the 'as-received' photograph taken prior to decontamination shows the lead connectors reversed with the marked connector inserted in the negative terminal/cavity of the pulse generator and the unmarked connector inserted in the positive terminal/cavity of the pulse generator header.Note that since a portion of the lead (including the electrode helices) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portions.Analysis of the generator was completed on 12/16/2014.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.No performance or any other type of adverse conditions were found with the pulse generator.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent generator replacement due to lead discontinuity.The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis.Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any anomalies.Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4221731
MDR Text Key4970355
Report Number1644487-2014-02907
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/06/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/03/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/30/1999
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number3690C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/14/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received12/15/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/19/1996
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age25 YR
-
-