Model Number 300-20 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
|
Patient Problem
Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980)
|
Event Date 11/03/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vns patient was experiencing painful stimulation in her neck.The patient¿s device was tested and system diagnostic results revealed high impedance.The patient¿s device was not subsequently disabled.X-rays were taken and reported to show a gross lead fracture next to a tie-down.The patient was referred for surgery but no known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to lead discontinuity.The explanted device were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Analysis of the generator concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.The device performed according to functional specifications.Analysis of the returned lead is currently underway.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis of the returned lead portions were completed.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, and no discontinuities were identified.Note that since the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any anomalies.Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|