• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION SABER PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA CATHETERS (LIT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION SABER PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA CATHETERS (LIT) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 48004004X
Device Problems Material Frayed (1262); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/01/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported, there was strong resistance felt and the saber balloon catheter could not be advanced further.It was removed and found to have a kink on the distal tip.Another saber balloon was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.After the device was received by the decontamination site, it was noted that the distal tip was near separation.The patient was a (b)(6) female.The lesion was right superficial femoral artery.The lesion was heavily calcified and not tortuous.The rate of stenosis was 99%.A contralateral approach was made from the left femoral artery with a non-cordis sheath introducer.A saber was tried to deliver to the target lesion for pre-dilatation with a non-cordis guidewire as back-up a few times, but the saber couldn't be delivered due to heavy calcification and couldn't advance further.The saber was removed from the patient and it was found that its distal tip was kinked.There was resistance felt and it couldn¿t advance.Therefore, the saber was stopped using and another saber was used instead and the procedure finished successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(continued from event description): the product was not clinically used.And it will be returned for analysis.After the device was received by the decontamination site, it was noted that the distal tip was near separation.The product was received but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.A device history record (dhr) review and additional information are pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.Concomitant devices: destination sheath, terumo; and cruise guidewire, sjm.(b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device codes: 3024- torn material.Additional information was received: there were no damages or anomalies noted to the device or packaging prior to use.It was confirmed that the distal tip was not kinked/bent or damaged prior to use.The device was stored, handled and prepped according to the ifu.There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop or removing the protective balloon cover and stylet.No unusual force was used at any time during the procedure.The balloon catheter was easily removed from the patient and it was removed intact.The near separation of the distal tip was noted by the customer after the device was removed.There was no patient injury.Complaint conclusion: during a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) strong resistance was felt whilst trying to advance a saber 4mmxcm 150cm pta balloon dilatation catheter through a lesion.It was removed and found to have a kink on the distal tip.Another saber balloon was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.After the device was received by the decontamination site, it was noted that the distal tip was near separation.The patient was a (b)(6) year -old female.The lesion was right superficial femoral artery.The lesion was heavily calcified and not tortuous.The rate of stenosis was 99%.A contralateral approach was made from the left femoral artery.There were no damages or anomalies noted to the device or packaging prior to use.It was confirmed that the distal tip was not kinked/bent or damaged prior to use.The device was stored, handled and prepped according to the ifu.There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop or removing the protective balloon cover and stylet.No unusual force was used at any time during the procedure.The balloon catheter was easily removed from the patient and it was removed intact.The near separation of the distal tip was noted by the customer after the device was removed.There was no patient injury.The product was returned.One non-sterile saber 4mmx4cm 150cm was returned.Per visual analysis it was found that the distal tip of the received unit was partially separated.The device was inspected under microscope and it was noticed that the separation edges present evidence of elongations.Sem analysis was performed to the partially separated area which showed that the tip presented evidence of elongations that could be induced by an application of force on the zone of the rupture.No other anomalies were found during the analysis.Device history review (dhr) of lot 16093237 revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The reported event of ¿distal tip - kinked/bent-in patient¿ was confirmed based on the condition of the catheter as received.As the tip of the received catheter was found bent and partially separated.As such, the complaint reported by the customer as ¿distal tip - frayed/split/ torn (peripheral)¿ was confirmed.The cause of the catheter tip kinked and damaged (partially separated) could not be conclusively determined during the analysis.Based on the information available for review, procedural factors (¿there was strong resistance felt and the saber balloon catheter could not be advanced further¿) may have contributed to the condition of the returned device.Additionally, the device was inspected by the customer prior to used and no anomalies were noted.This kink/bent and partially separated condition does not appear to be manufacturing related since sem results shows showed that the tip presented evidence of elongations that could be induced by an application of force on the zone of the rupture.The dhr and the product analysis results do not suggest that the reported issue is not related to the manufacturing process.Therefore no corrective and preventive actions will be taken at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Based on this information, there will be no changes to the conclusions reported in the 3500a-follow-up report # 1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SABER PTA DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
PTA CATHETERS (LIT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL
Manufacturer Contact
cecil navajas
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
7863133880
MDR Report Key4351926
MDR Text Key5204683
Report Number9616099-2014-00821
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K971010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Catalogue Number48004004X
Device Lot Number16093237
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/16/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age77 YR
Patient Weight65
-
-