• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR, Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Crack (1135); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 11/19/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that on (b)(6) 2014, the bottom lower housing of the autopulse platform has some cracks and a noise was coming from inside the platform, indicating that there is loose hardware inside the device.The platform is still functional.No patient involvement was reported.No further information was provided.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the autopulse platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 27 (encoder fault (>3000 rpm)) message.Additionally, during review of the platform's archive data, it was observed that a user advisory 18 (max take-up revolutions exceeded) message occurred on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2014.Although the customer did not report this, ua 18 and 27 are considered reportable malfunctions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform in complaint was returned to zoll on 12/2/2014 for investigation.Investigation results as follows: visual inspection of the returned platform was performed and found that the front enclosure, motor cover and top cover were damaged.The platform underwent initial functional testing using an lrtf (large resuscitation test fixture, equivalent to a 250 pound patient) and within 30 seconds the platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 27 (encoder fault (>3000 rpm)) message.A review of the archive was performed which found that a ua18 (max take-up revolutions exceeded) occurred on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2014.Multiple ua 27's were also observed throughout the archive.The front enclosure, motor cover and top cover were replaced to remedy the reported complaint.Additional work performed to ensure that the autopulse platform is functioning without issue: lcd and load cell amp cable and the encoder gearbox were all replaced.The platform underwent and passed all final functional testing.The customer's reported complaint of the platform having cracks on the bottom of the housing and something being loose inside was confirmed through visual inspection of the returned platform.The encoder gearbox was replaced to remedy the user advisory 18 and 27 faults found in the archive.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR,
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4382782
MDR Text Key5260194
Report Number3010617000-2015-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/19/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/05/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/02/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-