• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110; JCX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110; JCX Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PMX110
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Suction Problem (2170); Aspiration Issue (2883)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the middle cerebral artery using a penumbra system aspiration pump max 110.During the procedure, the physician turned on the pump max, however, it would not create suction.The physician was unable to aspirate using the pump max and the procedure continued using a syringe to aspirate.The syringe aspiration successfully cleared the m1, yet the m2 remained occluded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Prior to returning the pump to the manufacturer for evaluation, the distributor conducted their own device evaluation on the penumbra system aspiration pump max 110.During their evaluation, the vacuum cylinder was opened and a white, solid cream-like substance was observed and was suspected to be the cause of the suction issue.The distributor removed the white substance and re-assembled the motor and the pump began functioning normally with a vacuum level of 27 inhg.After the completion of the evaluation by the distributor, the device was returned to the manufacturer.The manufacturer found no visible damage to the exterior of the pump.According to the complaint, the pump did not work after the second use.Evaluation of the returned device post evaluation by the distributor, revealed that the pump was functional; however, due to the intervention (device evaluation) already carried out by the distributor, the root cause of the complaint cannot be determined and the complaint cannot be confirmed.These devices are 100% functionally tested during in-process inspection.Upon request by the manufacturer, a small sample of the white substance observed by the distributor during their evaluation of the device was sent to the manufacturer so that fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ftir) could be performed; however, the ftir analysis was inconclusive.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110
Type of Device
JCX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4492228
MDR Text Key5327495
Report Number3005168196-2015-00093
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K122756
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor,distributor,forei
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/06/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberPMX110
Device Lot NumberF08202-16
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/16/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/16/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-