On (b)(6) 2014, it was reported that this vns patient was referred for generator revision for an unknown reason.On (b)(6) 2014, a tc present at the patient¿s appointment preformed diagnostics: diagnostics were within normal limits.The generator was reported to be being replaced due to generator nearing end of service.The patient underwent generator revision on (b)(6) 2015.The generator was returned and underwent product analysis.Analysis was approved on (b)(6) 2015 and identified that the generator had reached a near end of service state sooner than expected based on a battery life calculation and an analysis of the generator¿s charge consumption counter.A review of the generator¿s device history record revealed that it was likely left programmed on to a high output state as a result of an incomplete final electrical test (fet) at the time of manufacture.The generator likely stayed in this high output state for months before being subjected to fet again, effectively programming the generator off.During the time in between fet tests, the generator is believed to have used a significant amount of battery capacity, resulting in the discrepancy identified in product analysis.There were no additional performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Review of the dhr shows that the device did pass all functional specifications prior to distribution.Review of in-house programming history shows that the ifi-indicator was first seen on (b)(6) 2014.
|