• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH PRIM BP W/HOLES BEAD W/PA SZ 7; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH PRIM BP W/HOLES BEAD W/PA SZ 7; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5527B700
Device Problems Break (1069); Crack (1135); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/08/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a stryker employee received a call from a family friend that thinks part of a stryker total knee replacement is broken.Stryker total knee, implanted late last year.His surgeon told him that his tibial implant has cracked in half.Update per sales rep: the patient's knee was being revised because the baseplate cracked in half.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Catalogue number unknown at this time.Device description reported as an unknown pa baseplate size 7.An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Additional information received indicated that the patient retained an attorney.Not returned to the manufacturer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device returned, age of patient is (b)(6) years.Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving a triathlon baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: a material analysis concluded: the tibial tray broke in fatigue.The loss of support under the insert caused the insert to break at the same location as the tray.The metallic particles observed in the insert were consistent with beads that came loose when the tray broke.The base material of the tray was a co-cr-mo alloy consistent with an astm f75 material.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.Medical records received and evaluation: review of medical records by a consulting clinician indicated: in this markedly obese patient, the unsupported (either by a bony defect and/or inadequate contact with the host bone at this site) posteromedial tibial plateau in this uncemented component was cyclicly loaded and eventually led to fatigue fracture at the junction of the supported and unsupported portions of the tray.Once fractured, the unsupported fragment subsided into the tibia and the insert fractured by the same mechanism.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.Device history review: indicates all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the material analysis report (mar) indicated: the tibial tray broke in fatigue.The loss of support under the insert caused the insert to break at the same location as the tray.The metallic particles observed in the insert were consistent with beads that came loose when the tray broke.The base material of the tray was a co-cr-mo alloy consistent with an astm f75 material.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.The medical review indicated: in this markedly obese patient, the unsupported (either by a bony defect and/or inadequate contact with the host bone at this site) posteromedial tibial plateau in this uncemented component was cyclicly loaded and eventually led to fatigue fracture at the junction of the supported and unsupported portions of the tray.Once.Fractured, the unsupported fragment subsided into the tibia and the insert fractured by the same mechanism.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a stryker employee received a call from a family friend that thinks part of a stryker total knee replacement is broken.Stryker total knee, implanted late last year.His surgeon told him that his tibial implant has cracked in half.Update per sales rep: the patient's knee was being revised because the baseplate cracked in half.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIM BP W/HOLES BEAD W/PA SZ 7
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NJ NA
Manufacturer Contact
cindy chuhinko
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4745666
MDR Text Key5887625
Report Number0002249697-2015-01426
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,consumer,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/04/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2017
Device Catalogue Number5527B700
Device Lot NumberS9DLA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/19/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight153
-
-