A nurse reported that following an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the patient experienced poor vision and the iol was scratched.The iol was exchanged for the same lens model and power.Additional information was provided by the nurse, who reported that the scratch on the iol blurred the patient's vision.The event resolved with treatment.
|
Additional information was provided.Evaluation summary: the product was returned for analysis; the reported complaint could not be verified, the optic is too damaged to conduct a check for the optical resolution or the diopter of the lens.Solution was observed on the returned product.The product was returned and damaged was observed.The lens was taped on a piece of foam.Additional information was provided, which indicated an approved cartridge was used with a handpiece with an unapproved viscoelastic.There was not enough information provided to conduct a review on the cartridge lot.The root cause could not be determined for the patients poor vision; however, the optic was scratched.While we are unable to determine the root cause of the damage, our observation reasonably suggests that this is not manufacturing related.Due to the condition of the returned sample, the damage is most likely related to customer handling.In addition, an unapproved viscoelastic was used which is a failure to follow the directions for use.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|