Catalog Number 352.040 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 07/12/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient initials are (b)(6).Device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned.Without a lot number, the device history record review could not be requested.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the flexible reamer shaft broke approximately one inch from the tip during a surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2015.The fragment was extracted by reinserting the beaded guide wire and using the extra flexible reamer shaft to ream.The surgeon was able to successfully implant the tibia nail without further incident.A surgical time delay of five (5) minutes was noted.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product investigation summary: the complaint condition for the 5.0mm flexible shaft (352.040) with unknown lot number was likely caused by years of use and possibly the application of excessive force; however, this complaint is not likely a result of any design related deficiency.The 5.0mm flexible shaft is an instrument routinely used in the flexible reamers for intramedullary nails system.The device was returned and reported to have broken while reaming.This condition is confirmed; the distal portion of the device has broken off at the metal joint approximately four and a half centimeters from the distal tip.It is likely that years of use and possibly the application of excessive force during surgery have led to this complaint condition.The balance of the returned device is in fair condition with some markings at the proximal end of the device over the part and lot number.Drawing was reviewed and determined to be suitable for the intended design, application and dimensional conformity when used as recommended.It is likely that years of use and possibly the application of excessive force during surgery have led to this complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|