In response to the request from the reporting facility, mckesson initiated an investigation in order to determine when the nm study was reviewed by the technologist.Mckesson investigation of the system logs indicate that the nm study performed on (b)(6) 2015 at 18:10 was marked as reviewed by the technologist on (b)(6) 2015 at 10:13.The nm study was reported by a radiologist on (b)(6) 2015 at 13:05.Based on the investigation performed and analysis of the application logs, there is no evidence of a device malfunction.
|
It was reported by the customer site that on (b)(6) 2015, a patient was imaged for a nuclear medicine (nm) study at 18:10.The patient expired on (b)(6) 2015 at 21:50.On (b)(6) 2015, the customer site clinical imaging administrator contacted mckesson requesting assistance, in determining,through the review of the pacs logs, the date and time the nm study was reviewed by the performing technologist and moved to the radiologist's worklist for diagnosis.
|