• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VOLCANO CORPORATION CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, FEMORAL; CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VOLCANO CORPORATION CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, FEMORAL; CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 7024
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/15/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to volcano policy.A film of the implant was reviewed and it was discovered a kink was present before the retrieval process started.Femoral approach was used for retrieval.An 8fr inner sheath was used with a cook retrieval set.An ensnare snare was used after the retrieval tail couldn't be captured with the clover snare.No complications were reported.All anchors were present after being inspected after retrieval.Pre-decontamination: the delivery system was not returned for investigation.A visual inspection was performed on the returned filter.There was a fracture in the cw wireform, located approximately 1/3 up the length of the wire from the caudal end.The cw wireform also crossed under rather than over the ccw wireform, due to the fracture.The caudal end of the fracture site was encapsulated by the fep/ptfe tubing and the end of the tubing was tangled in the filter web.All 3 verticals and the horizontal thread of the web were intact.The retrieval tails were present and intact.All anchors were also present and no deformities were noted.The plasma balls, marker bands, and all crimps were also present and intact.Post-decontamination: a visual and microscopic inspection was performed.There was some discoloration on the cw wireform.The fep/ptfe tubing was also damaged at the fracture site location.This most likely occurred due to friction with the blunt end of the wire while the device was being retrieved from the body.We were unable to conclusively determine how the failure occurred.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.To date, no other complaints were reported for this same failure mode within this lot.We will continue to monitor these types of complaints.
 
Event Description
It was reported the crux device was implanted 5 - 6 months ago.The filter broke during retrieval from the body.On inspection after retrieval all pieces were intact.There was no patient injury and no adverse events.All reasonably known patient information is included in this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, FEMORAL; CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
VOLCANO CORPORATION
2870 kilgore road
rancho cordova CA 95670
Manufacturer (Section G)
VOLCANO CORPORATION
2870 kilgore road
rancho cordova CA 95670
Manufacturer Contact
richard welch
3721 valley centre dr #500
san diego, CA 92130
8587641301
MDR Report Key5146031
MDR Text Key28107536
Report Number2939520-2015-00051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K150262
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 09/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/13/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/31/2015
Device Model Number7024
Device Catalogue Number7024
Device Lot Number0252 20030653
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
-
-