• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 105
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 08/11/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A physician reported to an international distributor that at a patient developed an infection at the implant site roughly 2 months after vns replacement surgery.The physician is unsure of the cause of the infection but suspects a titanium allergy.The patient experienced no prior allergies, infections, reactions with his prior vns device.The physician elected to remove the pulse generator.Manufacturing records were reviewed for the patient's pulse generator and lead and proper sterilization was verified for each prior to product distribution.The explanted generator was discarded by the explanting facility and is therefore unable to be returned to the manufacturer for product analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Uchida, d & yamamoto, t.(2017).Experience and solution of complications of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in 139 implant patients.No shinkei geka, 45(12):1051-1057.Doi: 10.11477/mf.1436203646.
 
Event Description
An abstract from a research article comprised of post-market surveillance data from a hospital¿s vns patients implanted between december 2010 and march 2016 was (also) received.The abstract indicated that four patients experienced recurrent vocal cord paralysis.The abstract also indicated that one patient experienced subsequent aspiration pneumonia.Three patients underwent explant due to surgical site infections, and one patient underwent explant due to a patient-influenced revolving of the generator which eventually resulted in lead fracture.The recurrent vocal cord paralysis is reported within mfr.Report # 1644487-2018-00123.A company representative received identifying patient information from the authoring physicians of the article for the patients who experienced surgical-site infections and generator migration and subsequent lead fracture, originally captured in mfr.Report #1644487-2018-00122.It was determined that the infections were previously reported to the manufacturer and are captured in mfr.Report #s 1644487-2013-02562, 1644487-2013-03225, and 1644487-2015-06368, the last of which corresponds to the events captured within this report.Per the abstract, allergic reaction was suspected to be a cause of the infection captured in this report.The reported patient-influenced migration and subsequent lead fracture was previously reported to the manufacturer and is captured within mfr.Report # 1644487-2018-00289.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 105
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5218034
MDR Text Key30995831
Report Number1644487-2015-06368
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/11/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/23/2017
Device Model Number105
Device Lot Number203316
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age29 YR
-
-