• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1013468-080
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The steelcore guide wire device referenced is filed under a separate medwatch report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a peripheral procedure to treat in-stent restenosis of an unspecified stent implanted in the right superficial femoral artery.A steelcore guide wire was advanced to the target lesion.A 2.0 laser was advanced and debulked the restenosis.An attempt was made to load the 5.0 x 80 mm armada dilatation catheter onto the guide wire; however, it became stuck.Attempts were made to remove the armada and the armada dilatation catheter separated outside the patient anatomy.The guide wire was in the patient anatomy, but the armada had not yet entered the anatomy.The steelcore guide wire and armada were removed from the patient anatomy as a single unit.A spartacore guide wire was then used with a new armada dilatation catheter without issue.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned and the reported resistance, separation and difficulty removing was confirmed.Based on visual dimensional and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The reported difficulties appear to be due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint handling database revealed no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLONMEL, IRELAND REG# 9616693
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5255093
MDR Text Key32411637
Report Number2024168-2015-07153
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151317
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/30/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number1013468-080
Device Lot Number5070941
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/07/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient Weight111
-
-