• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER; PTA CATHETERS (LIT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER; PTA CATHETERS (LIT) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4400510S
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/18/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: guidewire (radifocus, terumo), guiding catheter (6f parent, medikit).(b)(6).Additional information will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, after the guidewire (radifocus, terumo) crossed the lesion, a powerflex pro 5mm 10cm 80 balloon catheter was delivered to the lesion and inflated, however, at the same time of the inflation, leakage of media was observed and it could not be inflated.Therefore, the balloon catheter was changed out to a new unknown balloon catheter.The procedure finished successfully.There was no report of patient injury.A guiding catheter (6f parent, medikit) was inserted, crossed and approached the lesion.The guidewire (radifocus, terumo) could not be crossed easily with heavy calcification.The target lesion was the left common femoral artery.The lesion was heavily calcified and mildly tortuous.The rate of stenosis was 95%.The product was stored, handled, and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device did prep normally.It is unknown what contrast media was used.It is unknown what the contrast to saline ratio was.It is unknown what type and brand of inflation device was used.It is unknown if there was difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel or crossing the lesion.It is unknown if the balloon catheter was ever in an acute bend.The balloon catheter was removed easily and intact (in one piece) from the patient.The maximum inflation pressure is unknown.The device will not be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After the guidewire crossed the lesion, a powerflex pro 5mm x 10cm 80cm balloon catheter (bc) was delivered to the lesion and inflated; however, at the same time of the inflation, leakage of media was observed and it could not be inflated.Therefore, the balloon catheter was changed out to a new unknown balloon catheter.The procedure finished successfully.There was no report of patient injury.A guiding catheter was inserted, crossed and approached the lesion.The guidewire could not be crossed easily due to heavy calcification.The target lesion was the left common femoral artery.The lesion was heavily calcified and mildly tortuous.The rate of stenosis was 95%.The product was stored, handled, and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device did prep normally.It is unknown what contrast media was used.It is unknown what the contrast to saline ratio was.It is unknown what type and brand of inflation device was used.It is unknown if there was difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel or crossing the lesion.It is unknown if the balloon catheter was ever in an acute bend.The balloon catheter was removed easily and intact (in one piece) from the patient.The maximum inflation pressure is unknown.The device was not returned for analysis.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 15981958 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon leakage-during positive pressure (peripheral)¿ and ¿balloon inflation difficulty-unable to inflate¿ could not be confirmed as the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause could not be determined.Vessel characteristics of heavy calcification, mild tortuosity and a rate of stenosis of 95% may have contributed to the reported event.Neither the dhr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No device was returned and evaluated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER
Type of Device
PTA CATHETERS (LIT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL
Manufacturer Contact
cecil navajas
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
7863133880
MDR Report Key5277658
MDR Text Key33036856
Report Number9616099-2015-00635
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K112797
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/18/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/09/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number4400510S
Device Lot Number15981958
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
-
-