(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device was returned for analysis.The reported balloon rupture was not able to be confirmed.Based on a visual and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.A conclusive cause for the reported balloon rupture could not be determined.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the superficial femoral artery with moderate calcification.An unknown armada 18 balloon catheter was advanced toward the target lesion, the balloon was inflated, and the balloon ruptured below the rated burst pressure.There was no adverse impact to the patient.No other device was used to complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|