It was reported that the patient's vns device showed high lead impedance on (b)(6) 2015.X-rays were taken and the radiologist identified a lead fracture, although the neurologist did not visualize a fracture.It was stated that the patient was still receiving efficacy from vns magnet swipes.Device manufacturing records were reviewed and found all specifications met prior to distribution.The patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2015 due to prophylactic generator replacement and lead fracture.The explanted generator and lead have been received by the manufacturer for analysis.However, analysis has not been completed to date,.
|
Analysis of the returned generator and lead was completed.Analysis of the generator revealed no observed anomalies.The generator performed according to functional specifications in the analysis lab.Review of the associated generator data showed that the impedance value changed from a value of 14,048 ohms to 21,979 ohms on the day after surgery.Analysis of the returned lead showed abraded openings on the outer tubing.A coil break was identified in both positive and the negative lead coils.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive and the negative coil show that pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred at the break location.Appearance of the negative coil suggests a stress-induced fracture occurred in at least one strand.However, due to metal dissolution, surface contamination and/or mechanical distortion (smoothed surfaces) the fracture mechanism of other strands cannot be ascertained.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|