• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 12/30/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient had an ivc filter placed approximately 2 1/2 to 3 years.During a venogram, it was noted that the hook was embedded.In an attempt to remove the filter, one of the struts broke and remained embedded in the tissue.The cardiologist decided to not continue with the procedure and will keep an eye on the patient.The patient is stable at this time.According to the initial reporter, the patient is stable and did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation results - a review of complaint history, as well as a review of manufacturing instructions, quality control processes, and a review of trends was conducted.No product was returned and no imaging provided.Based on the information solely it is impossible to comment on the hook embedment and the filter retrieval resulting in the one of the struts to break and remain embedded in the tissue.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple versus complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Lot# unknown, however tulip filter is manufactured and inspected according to manufacturing specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.There is no evidence to suggest that device was not manufactured to specifications.No conclusion could be drawn based on the information available.Cook inc.Will continue to monitor for similar events.
 
Event Description
The patient had an ivc filter placed approximately 2 1/2 to 3 years.During a venogram, it was noted that the hook was embedded.In an attempt to remove the filter, one of the struts broke and remained embedded in the tissue.The cardiologist decided to not continue with the procedure and will keep an eye on the patient.The patient is stable at this time.According to the initial reporter, the patient is stable and did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key5346569
MDR Text Key35552546
Report Number1820334-2016-00025
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/06/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/30/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received12/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-