• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEURO - VILLALBA VECTRIS SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEURO - VILLALBA VECTRIS SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 977A260
Device Problems Unintended Collision (1429); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Nerve Damage (1979); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 97714, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: implantable neurostimulator.Product id: 3550-39, lot# n458894, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: accessory.Product id: 97740, serial# (b)(4), product type: programmer, patient.Product id: 97754, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.Product id: 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient reported pain in both legs.The left leg was hurting more with arthritis since 2007.The right leg was hurting every day since 6 months ago.The change in therapy/symptoms was considered gradual.There were no product issues alleged.The indication for use was spinal pain.Additional information received from the patient reported their pain was from personal injury prior to implant.The device was implanted to treat the pain and now it has worsened in both legs and knees.Sometimes the pain in their knees brings the patient to tears.They were currently seeking out a new doctor but have not yet been able to schedule an appointment.They have already had too many mris and don't know if they will have another one.Additional information was received from the patient who had an implanted neurostimulator (ins) for spinal pain on (b)(6) 2015 stating that they were wanting the implantable neurostimulator (ins) removed and was looking for a doctor who could remove it.There was stimulation in the wrong location.The stimulator had been implanted to cover the lower back pain, which was covered, but they were also receiving stimulation from their knees to their hip and into their shoulder.The patient had tried to adjust stimulation, but they were never able to get it to cover only where it was needed.The patient stated that new pain and nerve damage had been created by the stimulation.More issues had been created because the patient was feeling stimulation in both knees and both shoulders.The patient stated that because the lead was implanted where it was and tied to the nerve that it was tied to, stimulation was creating pain in their knees and shoulders.They still felt the pain when the stimulation was off, and this issue had been gradually getting worse.They felt that the stimulation had caused nerve damage, which was why they felt pain with the stimulation off.A magnetic response imaging (mri) had been conducted, which only showed severe arthritis, and the patient's doctor had not specified that the knee and shoulder pain was caused by nerve damage by the stimulation or lead.A change in therapy had occurred after they had fallen.The patient was on a hill and fell, and that was the time they noticed the change in therapy.The stimulation in the wrong location and the fall had occurred in (b)(6) 2015, and the new pain and nerve damage had occurred in (b)(6) 2014.A supplemental report will be submitted if additional information is received.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a healthcare provider reported that the last time they had seen the patient was on (b)(6) 2014.At that point the patient had not mentioned any nerve damage or stimulation issues.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient reported that the knee and shoulder pain started in (b)(6) 2015 and the patient was having trouble lifting their arms up to was their hair because of the pain.The patient had not used the ins since (b)(6) 2015 due to the pain.The patient had x-rays taken but they did not know the results of the x-rays.The patient had a doctor's appointment scheduled for 2016-(b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VECTRIS SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEURO - VILLALBA
call box 6001
villalba PR 00766
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key5366602
MDR Text Key35966371
Report Number6000153-2016-00106
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/11/2018
Device Model Number977A260
Device Catalogue Number977A260
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/29/2016
Date Device Manufactured06/11/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age00039 YR
-
-