Model Number 303-20 |
Device Problem
High impedance (1291)
|
Patient Problem
Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 12/23/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient, who was recently implanted with vns, experienced discomfort when the device was initially programmed on.Diagnostics showed that high impedance was present.The physician programmed the patient's generator off and ordered x-rays.The physician's office evaluated the chest x-rays that were taken on (b)(6) 2015, and they did not see anything that looked wrong.The x-rays were not available for livanova to evaluate.The patient had lead revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016.The surgeon did not test the lead impedance during surgery.He did not test the connection of the existing lead to the generator prior to replacing it.Therefore, it cannot be determined if there was incomplete lead pin insertion.The explanted lead is expected for return, but it has not been received to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi of suspect device: (b)(4).Brand name, corrected date: initial report inadvertently reported the incorrect brand name of the suspect device.Model #, corrected data: initial report inadvertently reported the incorrect model of the suspect device.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient felt pain in the left neck when her vns was turned on.The explanted lead was received on 02/02/2016.Analysis has not been completed to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis was completed on 03/01/2016.The entire lead was evaluated.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.Setscrew marks were seen on the connector pin, providing evidence that proper contact between the setscrew and the lead pin existed at least once.The high impedance was most likely related to a lead pin insertion issue since the lead did not have any anomalies that would have caused the high impedance.Since the pain the patient felt was in the neck area, it would not have been related to the high impedance, which only would have caused painful stimulation at the generator site.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|