• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX 15 HOLLOW FIBER OXYGENATOR AF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX 15 HOLLOW FIBER OXYGENATOR AF Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1CX*FX15W
Device Problem Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual device has not been returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.A follow up report will be submitted within 30 days of this report being sent.(b)(4).A review of the device history record and the product release decision control sheet of the involved product/lot # combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file did not find any other report with the involved product code/lot# combination.(b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that during prime the sampling line connection at the arterial line outlet was damaged on the capiox fx15 device.Follow up communication with the user facility confirmed the following information: (1) the oxygenator was changed out before the case; (2) surgery was completed successfully; and (3) there was no patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 for mfg.Report no.9681834-2016-00004 to provide the retention sample evaluation results.The actual sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, the investigation was based on evaluation of user facility information, and retention samples from product code 1cx*fx25w lot number 150615.Visual evaluation revealed no defects.The package configuration revealed that the joint between the blood out let port and the sampling line tube does not come into contact with any package materials.The retention sample was verified to be the normal product with no anomaly on the sampling tube.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction and the exact cause cannot be determined.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 for mfg.Report no.9681834-2016-00004 to provide the retention sample evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As stated, this report is being submitted as follow-up no.2 for mfg.Report no.9681834-2016-00004 to provide the return sample evaluation results.The actual device has been returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.Visual inspection upon receipt confirmed the customer's observation.The sampling line tube had been fractured at the joint with the oxygenator outlet port.Magnifying inspection of the fracture cross-sections of the tube revealed no defects.The tube was cut vertically and subjected to dimensional testing and confirmed to meet manufacturer specifications.Electron microscopic inspection of the fracture cross-sections found that some segments were in the smooth state and other segments in the rough state and revealed no defects which would have contributed to the generation of the fracture.Functional testing was conducted and was able to reproduce the reported defect.This test was conducted on a sampling line tube of a current product sample and was exposed to a shock force at the joint of the tube and the oxygenator outlet port after having been exposed to a low temperature of 4 degrees c for 12 hours.The sampling line tube became fractured at the joint.Electron microscopic inspection of the fracture cross-section found that the state of the surface was similar to the cracked cross-section of the actual sample.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction and the exact cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation results, it is likely the actual sample was subject to a shock force in the state of being cooled by having been left under a low temperature resulting in the reported breakage of the tube, however, the definite cause of the complaint could not be determined.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
This report is being submitted as follow-up no.2 for mfg.Report no.9681834-2016-00004 to provide the return sample evaluation results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX FX 15 HOLLOW FIBER OXYGENATOR AF
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer suh
reg. no. 2243441
2101 cottontail ln.
somerset, NJ 08873
8002837866
MDR Report Key5427165
MDR Text Key37978008
Report Number9681834-2016-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
UDI-Device Identifier04987350701206
UDI-Public04987350701206
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K071494
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/10/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number1CX*FX15W
Device Lot Number150615
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/22/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/09/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-