It was initially reported by the neurologist that he was unable to accurately detect the heart beat for the patient.It was noted he tried sensitivity settings 1 through 5, but only received.Troubleshooting was performed and it was found that the vns programming wand was working correctly, but that the data received light was not observed at all.The neurologist noted that upon initial interrogation of the patient's vns system, he was able to see the flickering of the data received light.The neurologist decided to program the autostim feature off, but left the normal mode and magnet mode programmed on.It was later noted by the company representative, who attended the vns implant surgery, that she was able to pick up the patient's heart beat right away, indicating the device was working properly.The company representative reached out to the neurologist to schedule an appointment where she would be able to help the neurologist with some troubleshooting.After the troubleshooting appointment, the company representative reported the issue of not being able to detect the patient's heart beat was repeated.The company representative tried changing rooms to eliminate possible sources of emi (electromagnetic interference).She verified all connections with the programming system were connected properly, turned off the lights, and checked the programming wand's battery life.The wand was also repositioned on the patient to try communicating from a different angle.Sensitivity settings 1 through 5 were all checked and it was verified that at the time of testing for the heart beat, the output current was programmed off.None of the troubleshooting resolved the issue.It was noted the device showed a heart beat once for a short period of time at setting 4, but went to all after.The programming history from the date of implant was reviewed and there were no anomalies noted which could have caused or contributed to the reported event.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
|
Review of the decoded data shows that on the date of the implant ((b)(6) 2016) for the m106 generator, sn: (b)(4), tachycardia detection was programmed off and sensitivity levels 1, 2, and 3 were tested.Interrogations were performed and showed 0 bpm, which would be expected with the tachycardia detection programmed off.System diagnostics were also performed, but the td was programmed off at the time.
|