• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 105
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 09/21/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient experienced coughing, pain and, gagging when the magnet was swiped at the higher setting.The patient was reported to tolerate normal mode settings.The device was turned off as the physician thought there might have been a lead issue.The last systems diagnostics were on (b)(6) 2015 and were within normal limits.Follow-up by the company representative revealed that the patient first reported the symptoms on (b)(6) 2015 and later tolerated all settings on (b)(6) 2015.On (b)(6) 2015 she tolerated normal mode, but not the magnet mode.X-rays were taken and it was stated that the physician did not see any issues in the x-rays.The x-rays have not been received by the manufacturer for review to-date.Additional follow-up by the company representative to the physician revealed that the patient had a laryngoscopy in the summer of 2015, and the neurologist believed the procedure may have disrupted the lead, and caused the patient's symptoms.The issues were reported to have resolved after turning off the device.The company representative reviewed diagnostics from the physician's handheld and the results were reported to be normal.The patient scheduled an appointment with the surgeon and had the lead and generator replaced (b)(6) 2015.The generator was reported to have been replaced prophylactically along with the lead and no issues were suspected with the generator.The choice by the patient to request revision of the device was stated to be due to the pain and discomfort.Additional follow-up to the physician's office revealed the lead was decided to be replaced from a visit with their office at the beginning of (b)(6).It was reported by the staff that the surgery was due to malfunction of the lead wire, but additional information regarding the malfunction was not provided.It was reported that diagnostics were not recorded in the notes from the patient's next visit before the surgery.No additional relevant information has been received to-date.The explanted devices have not been received for analysis to-date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the explanted products were discarded by the surgical facility.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 105
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5434813
MDR Text Key38204815
Report Number1644487-2016-00296
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/12/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/31/2015
Device Model Number105
Device Lot Number3763
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age33 YR
-
-