• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VOLCANO CORPORATION CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VOLCANO CORPORATION CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 7025
Device Problem Positioning Failure (1158)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/20/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to volcano policy.Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.During the pre-decontamination inspection, it was observed there was an overall curvature to the delivery system.There was a kink in the inner shaft at 147mm from the distal tip as well as bunching at this location.There was also blood present on the outside of the inner shaft.All hub components were present.The adhesive between the luer knob and the handle body was broken and the luer knob was able to freely rotate.The delivery system was functional and the outer shaft was able to be retracted.The filter was no longer in the delivery system.Both the cw and ccw wireforms of the filter were intact.The caudal retrieval tail was slightly bent in the clockwise direction.No damage to the ptfe tubing was observed.All anchors were also present and no deformities were observed.All crimps, both plasma balls, and both marker bands were present and intact.The filter web was also intact.Efforts to gain additional information on the procedure were unsuccessful.The customer reported the filter would not deploy.Device analysis of the returned device found the filter was deployed upon receipt.Volcano found no evidence of malfunction or that the filter would have difficulty deploying.There was a slight bend to the caudal retrieval tail, but his was not significant enough to have any impact on deployment.The kink in the inner shaft could cause a filter to become stuck; however, from what was reported it appears the kink was caused during removal.As the filter was deployed upon receipt, we were unable to conclusively determine whether the filter was difficult to deploy or if it was a user issue.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.To date, no other complaints were reported for this same failure mode within this lot.We will continue to monitor these types of complaints.
 
Event Description
It was reported the interventional radiologist was trying to place an ivc filter and the filter would not deploy.When the delivery system was removed the catheter was kinked.The catheter and filter removed all intact.There was no harm to patient.All reasonably known patient information is included in this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRUX VENA CAVA FILTER SYSTEM, JUGULAR
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
VOLCANO CORPORATION
3721 valley centre dr ste 500
san diego CA 92130
Manufacturer (Section G)
VOLCANO CORPORATION
2870 kilgore road
rancho cordova CA 95670
Manufacturer Contact
tom brennan
3721 valley centre dr #500
san diego, CA 92130
8587641320
MDR Report Key5435684
MDR Text Key38228687
Report Number2939520-2016-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K150262
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/12/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2017
Device Model Number7025
Device Catalogue Number400-0200.235
Device Lot Number0253 20063674
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/17/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-