• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH; UMBILICAL VESSEL CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH; UMBILICAL VESSEL CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 8888160333
Device Problem Air Leak (1008)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/01/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Submit date: (b)(6) 2016.An investigation is currently underway.Upon completion, the results will be forwarded.
 
Event Description
It was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2016 that a customer had an issue with an umbilical vessel catheter (uvc).The customer reported that after placing the catheter and drawing blood for lab work, microscopic bubbles continued to be observed just below the hub where the catheter is joined.They could not tell there was a problem until the catheter was placed in the baby, it requires resistance to be able to see the micro bubbles.Chlorhexidine was used to clean the skin area and the area was completely dried prior to insertion.It was not difficult to handle the catheter during insertion.It was not difficult to secure and was sutured to the stump of the umbilicus vein.The uvc was pulled before use.Ten ml ns was used to flush the line.The uvc was removed (b)(6) 2016 and was replaced with another umbilical catheter.The patient remains an inpatient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturing lot number associated with this complaint was provided and a device history record (dhr) review indicated that there was no quality issues associated with this reported mode.All dhrs are reviewed for accuracy prior to product release.The sample consisted of two uvc catheters; one of the samples presented signs of use (remains of blood) inside an original polybag of the catheter.Additionally, a syringe and a set of an unknown manufacturer were received with the catheters.Visual inspection confirmed that the samples belong to product id 8888160333 (assy-packaging, umbilical vessel catheter with hub).In order to confirm the issue reported a functional test was required.After testing, a hole below the strain relief in the catheter was found in the used sample and the other sample did not reveal any issues during functional testing or visual inspection.During the manufacturing process, catheters are submitted to a 100% pressure testing.The issue occurred after being in use in a patient, additionally, based on the reported dwell time; approximately 3 days without any issue.Due to the appearance of the catheter received, it is possible that the catheter body was damaged by instruments with sharp or rough edges during clinical use.Clinician pinches catheter during hub changes or other normal use causing a concentrated stress point, resulting in a catheter leak or break.It is important to consider that the instructions for use warn: exercise caution when using sharp instruments near the catheter.Do not use instruments with sharp or rough edges directly on the catheter since even a minor cut could tear or break the catheter.Do not pinch or bend the catheter back to temporarily occlude the catheter.This causes increased stress on the catheter which can lead to a leak or break and continues; do not use alcohol, acetone, or alcohol containing antiseptics directly on the catheter.Carefully check antiseptic solutions for alcohol or acetone.These substances may cause irreversible damage to the polyurethane which can lead to a leak or break.Ensure gloves or other surfaces which have alcohol on them are completely dry before touching or manipulating the catheter.There are a number of alternatives on the field like exposure to chemical agents, proximity to heat sources or manipulation per use that may lead to tubing tear.Moreover, the holes encountered caused a leak which would be identified during assembly operations.Based on the available information, it can be concluded that the product was manufactured according to specifications and the device functioned as intended for an undetermined amount of time; therefore the most probable root cause can be considered as misuse; this issue was more likely damaged during use caused due to an inappropriate manipulation by the user.It must be noted that in-process controls (such as personnel training, incoming quality acceptance testing for raw material, 100% in process visual inspection and visual acceptance sampling according to procedure) are in place to prevent nonconforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH
Type of Device
UMBILICAL VESSEL CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
covidien manufacturing solutions sa
edificio 820 calle #2 zona france coyol
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS SA
edificio 820 calle #2 zona france coyol
edificio 820 calle #2 zona france coyol
alajuela 20101
CS   20101
Manufacturer Contact
thom mcnamara
15 hampshire street
mansfield, MA 02048
5084524811
MDR Report Key5436190
MDR Text Key38774639
Report Number3009211636-2016-00075
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/01/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/15/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8888160333
Device Catalogue Number8888160333
Device Lot Number1525200090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/10/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-