• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION CG FUTURE BAND; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION CG FUTURE BAND; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 638B
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 01/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the product has not been returned for analysis, however, the return is anticipated.Conclusion: multiple attempts to gather additional information have been made; however, these attempts have been unsuccessful.Without return of the product, no definitive conclusions could be drawn regarding the clinical observation.Should the device be returned or additional information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 10 months post implant of this mitral annuloplasty band, the patient presented with severe paravalvular leak and severe central regurgitation caused by a type 1 fracture in the middle of the device.The device was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic valve.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the device was received in a cloudy solution in a plastic specimen cup.The band appeared slightly distorted.Green and white multifilament sutures remained attached to the cloth covering the band, and six loose metal clips, from an unknown manufacturer, were returned along with the band.Off-white pannus was attached to the body of the band.Radiography showed a fracture of the stiffener.The fractured piece with the eyelet appeared to have moved or dislocated outwards.Five metal clips were visibly attached to the band in the x-ray image.No calcification was noted.Conclusion: the investigation is ongoing.Additional information will be submitted in a supplemental report if, and when, it becomes available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Initial analysis of the returned device confirmed the reported fracture.A break in the band and a twisted band segment were identified via x-ray imaging.The device was sent for optical inspection and fractographic analysis completed using digital optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (sem).The analysis concluded that: the wire stiffener component of the device fractured during in vivo operation.The device fractured away from the mid-span of the wire as a result of cyclic (i.E.Fatigue) bending loads.The initiation sites of fracture were closely examined.Some surface anomalies were observed.It was possible that such anomalies were implicated in the development of the fracture.The origin of the surface anomalies were unknown, but were not likely caused by a scalpel or needle.The fracture surface of the device matched with reverse bending under nominal stresses loading conditions.Based on the analysis, a conclusive cause of the fracture could not be determined.The reported severe paravalvular leak and severe central regurgitation were likely due to the fracture.The instructions for use of the device includes ring/band fracture in the potential adverse events section.Medtronic adjusted the specification for the titanium stiffening wire under (b)(4).This material change was implemented september 2004.The device reported in this event was manufactured after the material change.The current rate of occurrence for this event type (i.E.The occurrence of a fracture of the stiffener leading to reoperation) has not exceeded the predicted rate of occurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CG FUTURE BAND
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5442403
MDR Text Key38410304
Report Number2025587-2016-00197
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K052860
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/02/2015
Device Model Number638B
Device Catalogue Number638BL38
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00068 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-