|
Model Number 5152-100 |
Device Problems
Material Rupture (1546); Torn Material (3024)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Hernia (2240)
|
Event Date 01/30/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the reporter, the patient had the device implanted in an open incisional hernia repair on (b)(6) 2016.When the patient sat up in bed, the patient felt a 'pop'.The patient underwent a reoperation on (b)(6) 2016 in order to determine what had happened.During the reoperation, the device appeared to have at least 4 shreds down one side.It was removed and replaced with a different mesh product.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) a visual examination of the returned device revealed the following: the sample was not returned in its original packaging; the mesh had been cut prior to insertion making it not possible to fully match the device dimensions to those that were reported; the mesh was torn in the fibrous direction and different colors were visible at various locations on the mesh (dark white, black (mold) and red); the texture was found to be flexible where the mesh was white and dry in the dark locations; and the sample seemed to be correctly cross-linked.Remains of the suture points were observed.Most of them were the origin of the tears.It has been determined that excessive tension may have induced tearing, beginning from the holes made by the suture points.Based on the instructions for use (ifu) that accompany the device, adequate overlap is recommended to ensure sufficient margins for incorporation.Due to the dimensions of the original device prior to being cut and the dimensions of the defect, there may not have been sufficient overlap.It is also indicated in the ifu that, if this surgical implant is shaped too small for the defect, excessive tension may be placed on the sutures and possibly result in recurrence of the original tissue defect or development of a defect in the adjacent tissues.A review of the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number of the device was not made available.Should additional information be received, the record will be re-evaluated and amended as needed.Corrected data: patient code(s) and device code(s).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received indicated that there were at least four shreds observed during the reoperation.The mesh had not been cut prior to implantation.The surgical site was not contaminated.The wound was closed after the procedure with skin staples and two subcutaneous drains.The device was sutured into the underside of the anterior abdominal wall with interrupted nylon sutures at approximately 12 fixation points.The hernia was approximately 10cm wide and 15cm long with an overlap of the device by about 3-4cm.During the reoperation, a larger overlap was placed with the new device.Two pieces of mesh were placed, one on the underside of the anterior wall and the other on the ventral wall.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|