Further follow-up found that troubleshooting to resolve the high impedance was performed when the new generator was connected to the existing lead which did not resolve the high impedance; therefore, the lead was also replaced.The generator and lead were received for analysis.Analysis of the lead was completed on 04/05/2016.Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The quadfilar coil was broken in several places.The coil had signs of fatigue stress and pitting which is indicative that stimulation occurred after the coil fractured.With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.Analysis of the generator was completed on 04/07/2016.Analysis identified that the high impedance began on (b)(6) 2015.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery, shows an ifi=no condition.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|